Monday, December 29, 2008

Bill seeks to declare oldest RP mosque as nat'l shrine

MANILA, Philippines - The first and oldest existing mosque in the Philippines may soon be declared a national shrine after a House panel passed a bill seeking to grant such recognition.

ADVERTISEMENT
A statement posted on the House of Representatives website on Monday said the Appropriations committee has approved House Bill 99 seeking to declare Sheikh Karimul Makhdum mosque in Tawi-Tawi as a national shrine.

Aurora Rep. Juan Edgardo Angara who filed the bill said the measure aims to give due recognition to Islam's role in the development of culture and civilization in the country.

"This bill would also be a sign to our brother Moslems in Mindanao that they are being accorded due and equal recognition by the national government," Angara said.

Muslim Affairs committee chair and Lanao del Sur Rep. Pangalian Balindong, Tawi-Tawi Rep. Nur Jaafar, and various government agencies have expressed support for the bill, he added.

The Sheikh Karimul Makhdum mosque, which was constructed by an Arab missionary in the 1380s, is located at the Tubig Indangan, Simunul, Tawi-Tawi.

In 1965, then President Ferdinand Marcos and First Lady Imelda Marcos went to the site to install a historic marker recognizing the mosque as the oldest in the country. - Johanna Camille Sisante, GMANews.TV

Personal Finance: 20 Dos & Don'ts for 2009

  • Thursday December 18, 2008, 8:08 am EST

During the worst economic crisis in a lifetime, the right financial decisions are crucial.

BusinessWeek asked financial planners for some advice on what to do -- or not to do -- with your money in the New Year. As we bid farewell to a dreadful 2008, these "resolutions" may help keep your finances on the right track in 2009:

1. Don't try to predict the future.

"We are currently in the midst of unprecedented and complex challenges," says Femi Shote of Asset Harvest Group in McLean, Va. Anyone who thinks he or she can predict what's going to happen is "delusional," Shote says.

Financial advisers often hear from clients who would like to sell stocks now and then buy again when the market hits bottom. "My response is, 'How do you know when that will be?'" says Trent Porter of Priority Financial Planning in Fort Collins, Colo.

2. Do keep enough cash available.

Even if you're not worried about losing your job, a rainy-day fund can provide peace of mind.

There are different guidelines for how much cash to keep on hand. Some say $12,000 or more per adult; others say it should be six to nine months of living expenses. With extra cash available, you can avoid selling investments to pay for expenses in an emergency.

3. Do invest internationally.

Though the financial crisis started in the U.S., the past year has been worse for investments in the rest of the world. The MSCI EAFE, an index of international stocks, is down 43% this year, and stocks in emerging economies fared far worse. American investors who diversified abroad have also been pummeled by the rise in the U.S. dollar.

Even after a year like that, advisers say it's not wise to abandon international investments entirely. For one thing, though some key overseas economies, like China's, have been hit hard lately, their long-term economic fundamentals look better than those of the U.S.

4. Don't try to pick one winning investment. Diversify.

Putting all your money in one stock is dangerous at a time when a company's bankruptcy can completely wipe out the value of its shares.

Robert Siegmann of Financial Management Group in Cincinnati advises clients to balance their portfolios between fixed income and stocks, with shares in various types of companies -- small and large, U.S. and international. "Don't try to pick the winning stock, or the winning idea. Just diversify across all investments and markets," he says.

5. Do think about energy efficiency.

Russell Francis of Portland Financial Advisors in Beaverton, Ore., recommends that investors take advantage of a $500 federal residential energy tax credit that was rescinded in 2008 but returns in 2009. The credit can help cover the costs of adding insulation or replacing doors, windows, or furnaces -- home repairs that should also save you on heating and cooling costs.

6. Don't stop contributing to 401(k) and other retirement accounts.

Says Sidney Blum of GreenLight Fee Only Advisors in Evanston, Ill.: "Everyone loves to invest in their 401(k) when the markets are flying high, but they should keep putting money in while the markets are down." He adds: "More money is made at the bottom of a market than at the top."

Even more pessimistic planners say you should be taking advantage of any match your employer offers for retirement fund contributions.

7. Do live below your means. Save.

Investing for the future is only possible if you have some money left over at the end of each month to sock away. View this BusinessWeek slide show for 25 ways to save more each month.

8. Don't make sudden moves.

"Refrain from making extreme changes to the portfolio just because the financial markets are volatile," says William Howell, a financial adviser in Noblesville, Ind. "Stick to the overall investment game plan."

In such an extreme environment, investment decisions based on emotion or fear are likely to lose you money. It's probably better to ignore the day-to-day news and follow a long-term investing plan.

9. Do pay off expensive debts.

Rather than investing your money, you first might consider paying off debts, especially those with high rates or those for which interest is not tax-deductible. The avoidance of interest will likely save you more than your investments would have earned.

Stanley F. Ehrlich, an adviser in Westfield, N.J., notes: "Paying off a car loan with 7% interest provides an immediate 7% return, a return that is not (currently) available through most asset classes." Credit-card debt is so expensive that most planners say it is always the first thing people should pay off.

10. Don't give up on stocks.

"Historically some of the best periods for stock market returns have been during dismal economic times," says Paul Winter of Five Seasons Financial Planning in Salt Lake City. Though investors approaching retirement shouldn't risk too much money in volatile equity markets, investors hoping to build a nest egg for the long term have few better options than the stock market.

11. Do track your spending.

"It's very easy to lose sight of where your funds are spent," says Alexandra Ollinger of Truepoint Capital in Cincinnati.

G.M. Livingston III, a planner in Santa Rosa Beach, Fla., advises clients to buy software like Quicken to track their spending. "It's a universal mistake," Livingston says. "Most people don't know where their money goes."

12. Don't pay high management fees.

It doesn't only matter how much your investments earn; it is also important how much you get to keep after trading costs and fees paid to financial advisers and fund managers. When market returns are small or nonexistent, even a 1% or 2% management fee can hurt. Decide if it's worth it. Also, check out offerings from traditionally low-cost fund companies like Vanguard, where the average mutual fund expense ratio is 0.2%.

13. Do review your credit reports.

With the Federal Reserve cutting the federal funds rate close to zero and policymakers eager to revive the housing market, mortgage rates are expected to drop substantially in 2009. That could be a great opportunity to refinance your mortgage, but only if you have a solid credit score. Check your credit report for any errors now, says Scott Beaudin of Pathway Financial Advisors in Burlington, Vt. "Fixing problems takes time and you don't want to be trying to fix your report while in the middle of a mortgage application," he says. The three U.S. consumer reporting agencies set up a Web site, to allow consumers to access a free copy of their credit report each year.

14. Don't follow the herd.

"Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful," says legendary investor Warren Buffett. Warren Ward, an adviser in Columbus, Ind., agrees, advising his clients to ease back into stock or bond markets rather than seeking the safety of cash or Treasuries as many other investors are doing now. "Do your own thinking and don't allow yourself to be panicked into taking an action you'll regret," Ward says.

15. Do write down an investing plan and budget, and stick to them.

A budget can help control spending and boost the amount of money you save each month. An investing plan takes the emotion out of your investing decision. "Investing systematically (is) especially (important) during market downturns," Ward says.

16. Don't forgo necessary insurance.

You can save some money by increasing your car insurance deductible or forgoing life, disability or home insurance, but you could also be left penniless after a serious emergency. Full coverage isn't always necessary, but make sure you're protected in a worst-case scenario.

17. Do check out your financial adviser.

The arrest of Bernard Madoff, who saw his $50 billion hedge fund collapse in an alleged Ponzi scheme, shows the danger of relying on one person -- whether a fund manager or a financial planner and adviser -- to handle your nest egg.

Don't just pick a broker or planner out of the yellow pages. "Do your homework," says Eileen Freiburger of ESF Financial Planning Group in Manhattan Beach, Calif. Ask advisers about their qualifications, certifications, and educations, as well as their fees, ethics and disclosure policies. Look them up in online databases that track complaints against planners. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's BrokerCheck is a good place to start.

18. Don't invest in anything you don't understand.

This financial crisis has demonstrated the dangers of too much complexity in the investing world. Investors lost big on asset-backed securities and other investments that in many cases they never really understood in the first place. If your adviser or broker can't adequately explain an investment in a few sentences, maybe it's not for you.

19. Do make sure safe investments are actually safe.

J. Mark Joseph of Sentinel Wealth Management in Reston, Va., sticks with supersafe government debt for his clients' fixed-income investments. "Bonds are for safety, so make sure your bonds are safe," he says. "Just because something is a fixed-income investment does not mean it is safe."

In case your bank or broker fails, make sure your bank accounts are covered by insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and your brokerage accounts by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation or supplemental insurance.

20. Don't take more risk than you can handle.

Some investors will react to 2008's losses by trying to be more prudent and conservative in the future. Others, however, will try to win back their losses through bold, risky bets on the next big thing.

That's happened in past downturns, says Elaine Scoggins of Merriman Berkman Next in Seattle. After the tech bubble burst, investors flocked to real estate. A classic mistake is "following one investing mistake by an even bigger one."

The past year has given investors an idea of how bad market conditions can get. In the future, investors may want to evaluate how much risk they're really willing to take and how long they're willing to wait to get outsize returns.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

EDITORIAL
Click to enlarge

11/24/2008

It seems that former Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr. has made good his vow to bare all about the shady dealings of Gloria to which he was witness, in the form of a surprise package of a book.

In an autobiography with a kilometric title “Global Filipino: The Authorized Biography of Jose de Venecia Jr., the Visionary Five-Time Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines,” De Venecia detailed a meeting among the First Couple, former Commission on Elections (Comelec) chairman and Chinese supplier ZTE broker Benjamin Abalos Sr., and ZTE officials in 2006 in Shenzhen, China to discuss the $329-million kickback bonanza that was the National Broadband Network (NBN) project.

All along many thought that JdV had again succumbed to his perennial weakness that is political vacillation and had forgotten all about his pledge to bare all he knew about corruption under the Gloria regime to the day he was ousted as Speaker in a House coup led by the two congressmen who are the presidential sons, who are now taking on the role of eminence grise in the House.

That portion of the book appears to be a written confession that if court jurisprudence would be followed, what he exposed would amount to damning evidence against Gloria.

The Supreme Court (SC) in the days after the 2001 power-grab of Gloria Arroyo, which the high court blessed, despite its unconstitutionality, extensively relied on the so-called Angara diary to “decipher” the intent of former President Joseph Estrada when he was claimed to have issued a statement to vacate MalacaƱang Palace. He never did. Instead, what Estrada did was to write two official letters to the heads of Congress, to state that he was taking a temporary leave of absence.

The SC, then led by Chief Justice Hilario Davide who violated the Constitution when he swore in Gloria Arroyo despite the fact that the presidency was not vacant, to seal the Estrada’s overthrow, ruled then that Estrada had resigned from the presidency based on the Angara diary, which, it must be stressed, was introduced by the court itself and worse, came after the fact of the swearing in.

The JdV autobiography should have the same weight as proof in the NBN controversy, which in turn is one of the grounds for impeachment cited in the latest complaint against Gloria, as Angara’s authenticated diary had been extensively used in justifying Estrada’s ouster.

Unconstitutional it was, but the SC decision on the Angara diary, from which was based the shameful doctrine of “constructive resignation” is already part of jurisprudence.

That part of De Venecia’s book should also have weight in the House deliberation on the impeachment complaint since it should offer strong proof on one of the grounds for the charges.

What JdV recounted were the fine details of whatever Gloria’s allies had long been challenging to be produced on the many corruption allegations in her administration.

Among all past political allies, JdV would have the widest window into the dealings of Gloria and her cohorts, including the sinister ones.

MalacaƱang may have dismissed the value of JdV in Gloria’s political equation too fast believing that JdV’s influence in the House was a thing of the past.

While he may have lacked the charisma to turn in the popular votes, JdV has polished his political acumen being the Speaker for longer than Gloria would have spent as president.

JdV obviously had more than pride at stake in what appears to be the start of a war of attrition against Gloria.

Earlier, JdV supposedly made a threat that if he goes down Gloria would go down with him.

Those who heard JdV utter those words may have misread him.

It could be that which was said was not a threat but a promise after all.

Back to top

Saturday, December 20, 2008

US circulates UN resolution to protect Iraq assets

UNITED NATIONS – The United States circulated a U.N. resolution that would shield billions of dollars of Iraqi assets from legal actions after the mandate for the U.S.-led multinational force ends, U.N. diplomats said Friday.

The draft resolution, obtained by The Associated Press, would extend for one year the arrangements under the U.N. mandate for the American-led multinational force in Iraq, which expires Dec. 31.

Similar legal protection under an executive order signed by President George W. Bush expires in May, and Iraq is expected to seek an extension of that order as well.

The U.N. resolution authorizing the multinational force is being replaced by a new U.S.-Iraq security pact which requires American forces to withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30 and the entire country by Jan. 1, 2012.

The draft resolution protecting Iraqi assets was sent to Security Council members late Thursday and is likely to be put to a vote early next week, U.S. diplomats said.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said in an interview Thursday that he has spoken to council members and does not expect any opposition.

A new resolution is "very important" to prevent Iraq's financial assets, oil shipments and property from being seized by governments, companies or individuals with legal judgments dating back to Saddam Hussein's 23-year rule, he said.

"The government needs this money to continue its security, political, economic programs," Zebari said. "We have reached a very critical stage of stabilization. We cannot squander these gains because of the lack of resources."

Revenues from Iraq's oil and natural gas exports, which account for at least 90 percent of the country's income, are held in the Development Fund for Iraq, set up in 2003. It has about $20 billion, from which the Iraqi government withdraws as needed. The Iraqi central bank's foreign reserves, more than $40 billion, are in another fund.

The draft resolution would continue the Development Fund for Iraq and authorize the International Advisory and Monitoring Board to keep overseeing the fund until Dec. 31, 2009.

It would extend a provision in a 2003 Security Council resolution stating that "petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas originating in Iraq shall be immune ... from legal proceedings against them and not be subject to any form of attachment, garnishment or execution."

Zebari stressed that in order for Iraq to regain "its full sovereign status, it has in the coming years to settle many of the legitimate legal claims."

The draft resolution cites a commitment from Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki "to resolve the debts and settle the claims inherited from the previous regime, and to continue to address those debts and claims until they are resolved or settled."

It asks "the continued assistance of the international community as the government of Iraq works to complete this process."

Zebari said Iraq will have to decide whether it's going to settle these claims through arbitration, government-to-government arrangements or paying a lump sum to victims, as Libya did for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.

On the issue of sovereignty, the draft resolution calls for a review of all resolutions on Iraq following Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait to consider what Security Council actions will be needed "for Iraq to achieve the status it enjoyed prior to the adoption of such resolutions."

Thursday, December 18, 2008

U.N. court convicts Bagosora for Rwanda genocide

Theoneste Bagosora, a cabinet minister in the former Rwandan government, is Reuters – Theoneste Bagosora, a cabinet minister in the former Rwandan government, is brought to court in Tanzania …

NAIROBI (Reuters) – A U.N. court convicted former army colonel Theoneste Bagosora Thursday of genocide in Rwanda in 1994 and sentenced him to jail for life.

"Colonel Bagosora is guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity and war crimes," the court said.

The Arusha-based International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) had accused Bagosora, 67, of being in charge of the troops and Interahamwe Hutu militia who butchered some 800,000 minority Tutsis and moderate Hutus.

(Editing by Dominic Evans and Keith Weir)

Obama looking at $850 billion jolt to the economy

By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Jim Kuhnhenn, Associated Press Writer – 22 mins ago
Play Video CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles – Obama Is TIME's Person Of The Year
Play Video Video: Obama chooses Republican for transportation post AP
Play Video Video: Obama and the Middle East Reuters
Play Video Barack Obama Video: The Future of Infrastructure FOXBusiness
AP – President-elect Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in Chicago, Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2008. After …
WASHINGTON – Anxious to jolt the economy back to life, President-elect Barack Obama appears to be zeroing in on a stimulus package of about $850 billion, dwarfing last spring's tax rebates and rivaling drastic government actions to fight the Great Depression.
Obama has not settled on a grand total, but after consulting with outside economists of all political stripes, his advisers have begun telling Congress the stimulus should be bigger than the $600 billion initially envisioned, congressional officials said Wednesday.
Obama is promoting a recovery plan that would feature spending on roads and other infrastructure projects, energy-efficient government buildings, new and renovated schools and environmentally friendly technologies.
There would also be some form of tax relief, according to the Obama team, which is well aware of the political difficulty of pushing such a large package through Congress, even in a time of recession. Any tax cuts would be aimed at middle- and lower-income taxpayers, and aides have said there would be no tax increases for wealthy Americans.
While some economists consulted by Obama's team recommended spending of up to $1 trillion over two years, a more likely figure seems to be $850 billion. There is concern that a package that looks too large could worry financial markets, and the incoming economic team also wants to signal fiscal restraint.
In addition to spending on roads, bridges and similar construction projects, Obama is expected to seek additional funds for numerous programs that experience increased demand when joblessness rises, one Democratic official said.
Among those programs are food stamps and other nutrition programs, health insurance, unemployment insurance and job training programs.
Obama advisers, including Christina Romer and Lawrence Summers, have been contacting economists from across the political spectrum in search of advice as they assemble a spending plan that would meet Obama's goal of preserving or creating 2.5 million jobs over two years.
Among those whose opinions Obama sought were Lawrence B. Lindsey, a top economic adviser to President George W. Bush during his first term, and Harvard professor Martin Feldstein, an informal John McCain adviser and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Ronald Reagan.
Feldstein recommended a $400 billion investment in one year, Obama aides said, and Lindsey said the package should be in the range of $800 billion to $1 trillion. The aides revealed the discussions on condition of anonymity because no decisions had been reached.
"I do recommend $400 billion in year one and expect a similar amount in year two," Feldstein said in an e-mail message. "The right amount depends on how it is used."
Lindsey could not be reached.
Obama aides also pointed to recommendations by Mark Zandi, the lead economist at Moody's Economy.com and an informal McCain adviser who has been proposing a $600 billion plan.
"I would err on the side of making it larger than making it smaller," Zandi said in an interview. "The size of the plan depends on the forecast — the economic outlook — and that is darkening by the day."
"Even a trillion is not inconceivable," he said.
Only one outside economist contacted by Obama aides, Harvard's Greg Mankiw, who served on President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, voiced skepticism about the need for an economic stimulus, transition officials said.
The advisers say they agree with economic forecasts that predict that without a government infusion unemployment will rise above 9 percent and not begin to come down until 2011.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Wednesday that Obama has indicated that Congress will get his recovery recommendations by the first of the year.
"He's going to get that to us very quickly and so we would hope within the first 10 days to two weeks that he's in office, that is after Jan. 20, that we could pass the stimulus plan," Reid said. "We want to do it very quickly."
In a letter to Peter Orszag, Obama's choice to be White House budget chief, Reid asked, among other things, that the stimulus package include tax relief for middle-class families, including a reduction in rates and an extension of the child tax credit.
Obama's aides have said they hope to work with Republicans in writing the bill, particularly in the Senate, where the GOP could slow action if it chooses. This week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats were preparing their own recovery bill in the range of $600 billion, blending immediate steps to counter the slumping economy with longer-term federal spending that encompasses Obama's plan.
A stimulus package that approaches $1 trillion could run into significant Republican opposition in Congress. It also could cause heartburn for moderate and conservative Democratic lawmakers, known as Blue Dogs, who oppose large budget deficits.
"Republicans want to work with the president-elect to help get our economy on the path to recovery, but we have grave reservations about taking $1 trillion from struggling taxpayers and spending it on government programs in the name of economic 'stimulus,'" House Republican leader John Boehner said in a statement.
In February, Congress passed an economic stimulus bill costing $168 billion and featuring $600 tax rebates for most individual taxpayers and tax breaks for businesses. Pelosi largely bowed to President Bush's insistence to keep the measure free of spending on federal projects.
The upcoming effort would dwarf that earlier measure as well as a $61 billion stimulus bill the House passed just before adjourning for the elections. That measure died after a Bush veto threat and GOP opposition in the Senate.
___
Associated Press writers David Espo and Erica Werner contributed to this story.
Collapse ArticleTurn OFF Expand/Collapse Article
Collapse Article
Related Searches:
christina romer
budget deficits
Recommend 71 users recommend

Monday, December 15, 2008

Alleged Madoff fraud has worldwide exposure

By JOE BEL BRUNO and JANE WARDELL, AP Business Writers Joe Bel Bruno And Jane Wardell, Ap Business Writers – 1 min ago
Play Video CNBC – Madoff Victims
Play Video Video: China Watch: Smoother Roads for Automakers TheStreet.com
Play Video Video: China Watch Mail Bag: the 'R' Word TheStreet.com
Related Quotes
Symbol
Price
Change
RBS
16.86
0.00
^GSPC
879.73
0.00
^IXIC
1,540.72
0.00

if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d['aN7UX0WTSRA-']='&U=13db6ta4f%2fN%3daN7UX0WTSRA-%2fC%3d635476.11991907.12479655.5439043%2fD%3dFB%2fB%3d5134491%2fV%3d1';
AP – In this Oct. 28, 2008 file photo, customers wait at a Tokyo branch of Nomura Securities Co. Some of the …
NEW YORK – The list of investors who say they were duped in one of Wall Street's biggest Ponzi schemes is growing, snaring some of the world's biggest banking institutions and hedge funds, the super rich and the famous, pensioners and charities.
The alleged victims who sunk cash into veteran Wall Street money manager Bernard Madoff's investment pool include real estate magnate Mortimer Zuckerman, the foundation of Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel, and a charity of movie director Steven Spielberg, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Among the world's biggest banking institutions, Britain's HSBC Holdings PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and Man Group PLC, Spain's Grupo Santander SA, France's BNP Paribas and Japan's Nomura Holdings all reported that they had fallen victim to Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme.
The 70-year-old Madoff, well respected in the investment community after serving as chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market, was arrested Thursday in what prosecutors say was a $50 billion scheme to defraud investors. Some investors claim they've been wiped out, while others are still likely to come forward.
"There were a lot of very sophisticated people who were duped, and that happens a great deal when you've had somebody decide to be unscrupulous," said Harvey Pitt, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a regulator in charge of monitoring investment funds like the one Madoff operated.
The extent of the potential damage prompted a leading fund manager in London to lash out at U.S. regulators for failing to detect the fraud earlier.
"I think now it is very difficult for people to invest in things that are meant to be regulated in America, because they haven fallen down in the job," Nicola Horlick, the manager of Bramdean Alternatives, which has 9 percent of its funds invested in Madoff's scheme, told the British Broadcasting Corp.
"All through the credit crunch this has been apparent," Horlick added. "This is the biggest financial scandal, probably, in the history of the markets."
Among U.S. investors, the Boston-based Robert I. Lappin Charitable Foundation, a charity that financed trips for Jewish youth to Israel, sacked its staff after revealing that the money for its operations was invested with Madoff.
New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg, one of the wealthiest members of the Senate, entrusted his family's charitable foundation to Madoff. Lautenberg's attorney, Michael Griffinger, said they weren't yet sure the extent of the foundation's losses, but that the bulk of its investments had been handled by Madoff.
Lautenberg's foundation handed out more than $765,000 to at least 100 recipients in 2006, according to the most recent listing on Guidestar, which tracks charitable organization filings.
The foundation helps support a variety of religious, educational, civic and arts organizations in New Jersey and elsewhere, and its contributions range from a gift of than $300,000 to the United Jewish Communities of MetroWest New Jersey to a $2,000 donation to a children's program at the Hackensack Medical Center.
Reports from Florida to Minnesota included profiles of ordinary investors who gave Madoff their money. Some had been friends with him for decades, others were able to invest because they were a friend of a friend. They told stories of losing everything from $40,000 to an entire nest egg worth well over $1 million.
They join a list of more powerful investors that have come forward, all worried about the extent of their losses. The roster of names include former Philadelphia Eagles owner Norman Braman, New York Mets owner Fred Wilpon and J. Ezra Merkin, the chairman of GMAC Financial Services, among others.
Among those overseas confirming exposure on Monday, Banco Santander, the largest bank in the euro zone by market capitalization, said its clients have 2.33 billion euros ($3.07 billion) in exposure with Madoff, mostly through a fund called Optimal Strategic US Equity.
HSBC, Britain's largest bank, said a "small number" of its insitutional clients had exposure totaling some US$1 billion in Madoff funds.
It added that it has custody clients who have invested with Madoff, but it did not believe those "custodial arrangements should be a source of exposure to the group."
Royal Bank of Scotland — Britain's second-largest bank, which is now 58 percent owned by the British government — said it could lose around 400 million euros pounds ($600 million) through exposure in trading and collateralized lending to funds of hedge funds invested with Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC.
Man Group, the world's largest publicly traded fund manager that reported exposure of around $360 million on Monday, said "it appears that a systematic and comprehensive fraud may have been committed, evading a range of structural controls."
Nomura Holdings said it has 27.5 billion yen ($306 million) in exposure, but added that any losses were likely to be limited compared to its capital base.
On Friday, representatives from major U.S. banks — Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., PNC Financial Services Group Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. — declined to comment on if they had exposure to Madoff's company. Both BlackRock Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said they had no exposure.
Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo & Co., Comerica Inc. and U.S. Bancorp did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
Collapse ArticleTurn OFF Expand/Collapse Article
Collapse Article

Friday, December 12, 2008

Bernard Madoff arrested over alleged $50 billion fraud

By Edith Honan and Dan Wilchins Edith Honan And Dan Wilchins – 2 mins ago
Reuters – …
Play Video Video: The Future of Wall Street CNBC
Play Video Video: Gov. Blagjevich as a CEO: Would he Survive? FOXBusiness
Related Quotes
Symbol
Price
Change
^DJI
8,565.09
-196.33
^GSPC
873.59
-25.65
^IXIC
1,507.88
-57.60

if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d['exc0S9GDJHw-']='&U=13dd17828%2fN%3dexc0S9GDJHw-%2fC%3d635476.11991907.12479655.5439043%2fD%3dFB%2fB%3d5134491%2fV%3d1';
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Bernard Madoff, a quiet force on Wall Street for decades, was arrested and charged on Thursday with allegedly running a $50 billion "Ponzi scheme" in what may rank among the biggest fraud cases ever.
The former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market is best known as the founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, the closely-held market-making firm he launched in 1960. But he also ran a hedge fund that U.S. prosecutors said racked up $50 billion of fraudulent losses.
Madoff told senior employees of his firm on Wednesday that "it's all just one big lie" and that it was "basically, a giant Ponzi scheme," with estimated investor losses of about $50 billion, according to the U.S. Attorney's criminal complaint against him.
A Ponzi scheme is a swindle offering unusually high returns, with early investors paid off with money from later investors.
On Thursday, two agents for the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation entered Madoff's New York apartment.
"There is no innocent explanation," Madoff said, according to the criminal complaint. He told the agents that it was all his fault, and that he "paid investors with money that wasn't there," according to the complaint.
The $50 billion allegedly lost would make the hedge fund one of the biggest frauds in history. When former energy trading giant Enron filed for bankruptcy in 2001, one of the largest at the time, it had $63.4 billion in assets.
U.S. prosecutors charged Madoff, 70, with a single count of securities fraud. They said he faces up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $5 million.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed separate civil charges against Madoff.
"Our complaint alleges a stunning fraud -- both in terms of scope and duration," said Scott Friestad, the SEC's deputy enforcer. "We are moving quickly and decisively to stop the scheme and protect the remaining assets for investors."
Dan Horwitz, Madoff's lawyer, told reporters outside a downtown Manhattan courtroom where he was charged, "Bernard Madoff is a longstanding leader in the financial services industry. We will fight to get through this unfortunate set of events."
A shaken Madoff stared at the ground as reporters peppered him with questions. He was released after posting a $10 million bond secured by his Manhattan apartment.
Authorities, citing a document filed by Madoff with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2008, said Madoff's investment advisory business served between 11 and 25 clients and had a total of about $17.1 billion in assets under management. Those clients may have included other funds that in turn had many investors.
The SEC said it appeared that virtually all of the assets of his hedge fund business were missing.
CONSISTENT RETURNS
An investor in the hedge fund said it generated consistent returns, which was part of the attraction. Since 2004, annual returns averaged around 8 percent and ranged from 7.3 percent to 9 percent, but last decade returns were typically in the low-double digits, the investor said.
The fund told investors it followed a "split strike conversion" strategy, which entailed owning stock and buying and selling options to limit downside risk, said the investor, who requested anonymity.
Jon Najarian, an acquaintance of Madoff who has traded options for decades, said "Many of us questioned how that strategy could generate those kinds of returns so consistently."
Najarian, co-founder of optionmonster.com, once tried to buy what was then the Cincinnati Stock Exchange when Madoff was a major seatholder on the exchange. Najarian met with Madoff, who rejected his bid.
"He always seemed to be a straight shooter. I was shocked by this news," Najarian said.
'LOCK AND KEY'
Madoff had long kept the financial statements for his hedge fund business under "lock and key," according to prosecutors, and was "cryptic" about the firm. The hedge fund business was located on a separate floor from the market-making business.
Madoff has been conducting a Ponzi scheme since at least 2005, the U.S. said. Around the first week of December, Madoff told a senior employee that hedge fund clients had requested about $7 billion of their money back, and that he was struggling to pay them.
Investors have been pulling money out of hedge funds, even those performing well, in an effort to reduce risk in their portfolios as the global economy weakens.
The fraud alleged here could further encourage investors to pull money from hedge funds.
"This is a major blow to confidence that is already shattered -- anyone on the fence will probably try to take their money out," said Doug Kass, president of hedge fund Seabreeze Partners Management. Kass noted that investors that put in requests to withdraw their money can subsequently decide to leave it in the fund if they wish.
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities has more than $700 million in capital, according to its website.
Madoff remains a member of Nasdaq OMX Group Inc's nominating committee, and his firm is a market maker for about 350 Nasdaq stocks, including Apple, EBay and Dell, according to the website.
The website also states that Madoff himself has "a personal interest in maintaining the unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm's hallmark."
The company's website may be found here: http://www.madoff.com/
(Additional reporting by Christian Plumb, Phil Wahba, Michelle Nichols and Jennifer Ablan in New York and Rachelle Younglai in Washington; Editing by Andre Grenon, Bernard Orr and Alex Richardson)
Collapse ArticleTurn OFF Expand/Collapse Article
Collapse Article
Recommend No users recommend
Buzz Up

Senate report ties Rumsfeld to Abu Ghraib abuse

By David Morgan David Morgan – 2 hrs 16 mins ago
Featured Topics:
Barack Obama
Presidential Transition
Play Video AP – Rumsfeld nemesis to be named VA secretary
Play Video Video: Groups call on US to stop using music as torture AP
Play Video Video: Bush talks Iraq, regrets Reuters
Reuters – Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld testifies during a House Oversight and Government Reform …
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other senior U.S. officials share much of the blame for detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, according to portions of a report released on Thursday by the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The report's executive summary, made public by the committee's Democratic chairman Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan and its top Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, said Rumsfeld contributed to the abuse by authorizing aggressive interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay on December 2, 2002.
He rescinded the authorization six weeks later. But the report said word of his approval continued to spread within U.S. military circles and encouraged the use of harsh techniques as far away as Iraq and Afghanistan.
The report concluded that Rumsfeld's actions were "a direct cause of detainee abuse" at Guantanamo and "influenced and contributed to the use of abusive techniques ... in Afghanistan and Iraq."
"The abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib in late 2003 was not simply the result of a few soldiers acting on their own," the executive summary said.
"Interrogation techniques such as stripping detainees of their clothes, placing them in stress positions and using military working dogs to intimidate them appeared in Iraq only after they had been approved for use in Afghanistan and at (Guantanamo)."
The detainee scandal at Abu Ghraib and later revelations of aggressive U.S. interrogations such as "waterboarding" led to an international outcry and charges that the United States allowed prisoners to be tortured, a claim denied by the Bush administration.
The Bush administration has since recanted the policies under pressure from Congress, while President-elect Barack Obama has vowed to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay.
The report found that the military derived the techniques from a Survival Evasion Resistance and Escape program, or SERE, which trains U.S. soldiers to resist enemy interrogation that does not conform to the Geneva Conventions or international law.
"These policies are wrong and must never be repeated," McCain, who last month ended an unsuccessful bid for the White House, said in a statement released with the executive summary.
McCain said the report revealed an "inexcusable link between abusive interrogation techniques used by our enemies who ignored the Geneva Conventions and interrogation policy for detainees in U.S. custody."
The full report, billed as the most thorough examination of U.S. military detainee policy by Congress, remains classified.
Committee staff said the full report was approved on November 20 in a unanimous voice vote by 17 of the panel's 25 members. The panel consists of 13 Democrats and 12 Republicans.
The executive summary also traces the erosion of detainee treatment standards to a Feb,. 7, 2002, memorandum signed by President George W. Bush stating that the Geneva Convention did not apply to the U.S. war with al Qaeda and that Taliban detainees were not entitled to prisoner of war status or legal protections.
"The president's order closed off application of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, which would have afforded minimum standards for humane treatment," the summary said.
Members of Bush's Cabinet and other senior officials participated in meetings inside the White House in 2002 and 2003 where specific interrogation techniques were discussed, according to the report.
The committee also blamed former Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Richard Myers for undermining the military's review of interrogation methods.
Collapse ArticleTurn OFF Expand/Collapse Article
Collapse Article
Recommend 102 users recommend
Buzz Up
Send

IM
Share
Digg

Newsvine
del.icio.us
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Yahoo! Bookmarks
Print
(function() {
/**
* YUI function to get all elements by class name
* getElementsByClass
*/
function getElementsByClass(className, tag, root) {
tag = tag '*';
root = (typeof root == 'string') ? document.getElementById(root) : root document;

var nodes = [],
elements = root.getElementsByTagName(tag),
re = new RegExp('(?:^\\s+)' + className + '(?:\\s+$)');

for (var i = 0, len = elements.length; i defaultHeight) {

// if primary exists then use that height, otherwise use related
var obj = getElementsByClass('primary-media','div',related)[0];
if (!obj) obj = related;

// set height from primary or related container
minHeight = parseInt(obj.offsetHeight, 10);

// if the minheight is smaller than default, then set it to default
if (
(minHeight heightLimit)
{
// set overflow and height
bd.style.height = minHeight + "px";
bd.className += " overflow";
story.className += " read-closed";

// add read more expand button
var div = document.createElement('div');
div.className = 'read-more read-more-expand';
div.innerHTML = 'Read Full Article';

// we have to handle the case where a user might click the button before our YUI script loads
// if so, remove the height and overflow setting then hide the button, also add #full hash to url so
// if script eventually is loaded it doesnt recreate the buttons and collapse the story
div.onclick = function(ev) {
var e = ev window.event;

// show full story
bd.style.height = 'auto';
bd.className = bd.className.replace('overflow','expanded');
story.className = story.className.replace('read-closed','');

// hide the toggle button
div.className += ' hide';

// disable link follow
if (e.preventDefault) {
e.preventDefault();
} else {
e.returnValue = false;
}
}

// add div to document
bd.appendChild(div);
}

}
})();

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Obama hopes to reboot US image among Muslims

By JENNIFER LOVEN, AP White House Correspondent Jennifer Loven, Ap White House Correspondent – 24 mins ago
Featured Topics:
Barack Obama
Presidential Transition
AP – President-elect Barack Obama is seen after speaking about Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich during his meeting …
Slideshow: President-elect Barack Obama
Play Video Video: View from Gitmo FOX News
Play Video Video: Obama calls for Blagojevich to resign AP
WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama says he will try to "reboot America's image" among the world's Muslims and will follow tradition by using his entire name — Barack Hussein Obama — in his swearing-in ceremony.
The U.S. image globally has taken a deep hit during President George W. Bush's two terms in office, primarily because of opposition to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, harsh interrogation of prisoners, the indefinite detention of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and mistreatment of inmates at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
Obama promised during his campaign that one of his top priorities would be to work to repair America's reputation worldwide, and that one element of that effort would be a speech delivered in a Muslim capital.
He pledged anew to give such a speech, though he declined to say whether it would happen during his first year in office.
"It's something I intend to follow through on," Obama said in an interview published Wednesday in the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times. "We've got a unique opportunity to reboot America's image around the world and also in the Muslim world in particular. So we need to take advantage of that."
Obama said his message would be twofold: that his administration will be unyielding in stamping out terrorist extremism but also "unrelenting in our desire to create a relationship of mutual respect and partnership with countries."
"I think the world is ready for that message," he said in the interview, conducted Tuesday.
During the campaign, Obama repeatedly faced questions about whether he is a Muslim, particularly in whisper campaigns that noted his middle name, that his father is Kenyan, and that he lived for a time as a child in Indonesia. Obama is a practicing Christian.
Asked if he would drop his middle name during his inauguration on Jan. 20, the president-elect said he would not.
"The tradition is that they use all three names and I will follow the tradition, not trying to make a statement on way or another," he said.
Obama also talked about the spiritual support he sought during his White House bid, particularly since he and his family left Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ after inflammatory comments by its pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, became a campaign issue.
Obama said he set up a "sort of prayer circle across the country" of pastors who would pray for him every morning on a conference call. Obama said he sometimes joined the call, which involved leaders from various Christian denominations and other religious faiths.
"I'm not even sure that all of them voted for me," Obama said. "But they were willing to pray for me, and that's something that was wonderful."
On other topics:
_Obama would not put a timetable on issues important to organized labor, what he called his promise to "put an end to the kinds of barriers and roadblocks that are in the way of workers legitimately coming together in order to form a union and bargain collectively." Among other things, he has promised support for a card-check system for unions trying to organize a new workplace and for adding labor and environmental protections to the North American Free Trade Agreement. "I don't want to anticipate right now what sequences will be on these issues," Obama said.
_The man about to be the nation's first black president said he will make enforcing civil rights laws and making the criminal justice system color-blind top priorities for his administration. The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division "over the last eight years has had a lot of problems and really declining morale," he said.
_Obama said he, his wife Michelle and their two young daughters will make frequent visits during his presidency back to their home in Chicago, perhaps as often as every six weeks. "My Kennebunkport is on the South Side of Chicago," he said. "Our friends are here. Our family is here. And so we are going to try to come back here as often as possible."
Recommend 162 users recommend

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Panel asks Obama to stress genocide prevention

Topics:
Barack Obama
Presidential Transition
Play Video Reuters – Rebuilding the economy
Play Video Video: Supreme Court won't review Obama's citizenship AP
Play Video Video: Windsor Marching Band Picked For Inauguration CBS4 Denver
Play Video Video: Racist fliers found in Raleigh neighborhood WRAL Raleigh
Reuters – File photo shows President-elect Barack Obama in Independence Park in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania December …
WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama should make preventing genocide and mass atrocities a priority for his government and establish a procedure to determine when the threat of genocide is emerging, a task force led by former Cabinet officials recommended Monday.
The objective always should be to stop the buildup before killing begins, their report said, but Obama and his successors should not shirk from using military force, with or without allies, when necessary.
"We urge America's 44th president to demonstrate at the outset that preventing genocide and mass atrocities is a national priority," said the report, titled "Preventing Genocide: A Blueprint for U.S. Policymakers." "Achieving this goal will require the president to muster political will that has too often been lacking in the past."
It said genocide's consequences go far beyond the turmoil in which it occurs. For one thing, refugees are created who must be cared for.
The report also recommended that Congress provide $250 million, "less than a dollar for every American each year," for rapid use to deter genocide anywhere in the world, it said.
The document was prepared by the Genocide Prevention Task Force, headed by Madeleine Albright, secretary of state, and William Cohen, defense secretary, under former President Bill Clinton. Clinton was in the White House when most of the Bosnian civil war atrocities and the genocide in Rwanda occurred.
The task force was formed by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the American Academy of Diplomacy and the United States Institute of Peace. Its publication notes that 2008 is the 60th anniversary of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the 20th anniversary of the U.S. ratification of the treaty.
___
On the Net:
United States Institute of Peace: http://www.usip.org/genocide_taskforce/index.html
Collapse ArticleTurn OFF Expand/Collapse Article

Escudero echoes calls for Arroyo to make stand on Cha-cha

MANILA, Philippines - Senator Francis Escudero on Tuesday echoed calls for President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to issue a categorical statement on Charter change amid efforts by her allies at the Lower House to push for various modes of amending the Constitution.
In a press statement, Escudero said without a categorical position on Cha-cha, President Arroyo has fed on her allies' efforts to push Charter Change at the Lower House, much to the detriment of the Filipinos.
"She (Mrs Arroyo) should stop engaging in double speak and categorically state her position on Charter change as her allies continue to push for it," said Escudero, chairman of the Senate committee on constitutional amendments, revision of codes and laws.
While admitting that Charter change is an important political exercise to ensure progress, Escudero said any contemplated change in the Constitution should be accorded with the adequate time and resources.
"If there is indeed a need to change the Constitution, it should be done after the elections in 2010 where the search for the rightful and meaningful changes in the constitution continues as a deliberative and transparent process," the senator said.
Escudero noted that the Charter change issue is distracting the President, the government and the people from more important issues at hand like the looming economic crisis next year.
"We are facing a more pressing problem next year. The chief executive should take the rein on this rough ride with more attention and swift action because the economic plague that has swept even first world countries cannot be understated," Escudero said.
Escudero said Mrs Arroyo should keep her eyes on the ball and focus on addressing more important issues like job creation and security, living wages and affordable commodity prices.
He said among the steps the President can do is to "invest in the Philippines" and stop exporting financial resources to places of corporate greed and toxic mortgages and financial meltdowns.
Escudero said funds managed by government pension groups like GSIS and SSS and government financial institutions like the Development Bank of the Philippines' pump priming activities could fill the gap in foreign direct investments which plunged by more that half to $1.08 billion from $2.49 billion a year ago.
The GSIS has $1 billion in its global investment program scattered throughout the world including some placed in iconic Wall Street firms which have crashed.
DBP on the other hand, which trades on derivatives, had reported parking $90 million in the failed US giant investment bank Lehman Brothers and in a recent disclosure is poised to write off.
"Foremost in the mind of every Filipinos nowadays are food to put on the table, shelter for the family and a job to secure these basic necessities which the government ought to be providing opportunities for. The president should rise up to the occasion and push away any personal agenda," Escudero said. - Amita Legaspi, GMANews.TV
YAHOO.EU.Messenger = new Messenger();
var sStoryHeadline="Escudero echoes calls for Arroyo to make stand on Cha-cha"+'%0A';
var sStoryLink="http://ph.news.yahoo.com/gma/20081209/tph-escudero-echoes-calls-for-arroyo-to-d6cd5cf.html"+'%0A';
var sDefaultMsg = 'Check out this story on Yahoo! News:';
Email Story
IM Story
Printable View
Blog This
addSendViaIM();
Recommend this article

Sunday, December 7, 2008

AP IMPACT: Donors, lobbyists help Obama get ready

By RITA BEAMISH, Associated Press Writer Rita Beamish, Associated Press Writer – 37 mins ago
Featured Topics:
Barack Obama
Presidential Transition
AP – In this Aug. 4, 2007 file photo, then Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., talks …
Play Video Video: Early Honeymoon? FOX News
Video: Unflattering Photo FOX News
Related Quotes
Symbol
Price
Change
ATT
23.95
0.00
FNM
0.87
0.00
IACI
15.16
+1.01
Faced with hiring a new administration, President-elect Barack Obama is learning how hard it is to keep his promise to avoid aides who have been entangled with the capital's lobbying scene.
An Associated Press review of more than 400 members of Obama's transition team identified at least 34 who have registered in recent years to lobby government officials on behalf of clients or employers — some as recently as this summer. The AP's review represents the most comprehensive examination to date of people working on Obama's incoming administration.
During the campaign, Obama promised to keep lobbyists at arm's length, and he has taken steps aimed at keeping out the taint of the influence business. He imposed first-ever rules that prohibit anyone on his transition team from working in policy areas on which they had lobbied in the past year — an arbitrary time period — and a withdrawal system was set up for anyone who might run afoul of the rule.
"By moving lobbyists out of the particular matters they lobbied, our policy distances them from the interests of their clients," transition spokesman Tommy Vietor said.
Yet, as Obama is finding out, it is impractical to plan and fill up a new government without connections to lobbyists.
Among the AP's findings:
_An Obama adviser on immigration issues, Maria Echaveste, lobbied for the United Farm Workers this year to protect immigrant agricultural workers as the Bush administration sought to ease hiring of seasonal farm labor and Congress debated an immigration overhaul. Echaveste, who worked in the White House and Labor Department under President Bill Clinton, assured Obama she will not weigh in on the farmworker visa issue that was her lobbying focus.
_The former Agriculture Department official leading Obama's agricultural policy review, Bart Chilton, lobbied until last year as vice president of the National Farmers Union. It spends hundreds of thousands of dollars each year to press for farm subsidy programs, fighting the North American Free Trade Agreement and reducing taxes on farms and ranches.
_A lawyer working on Indian issues for Obama, Keith Harper, has worked as a lawyer for Native American tribes, and wrote in a 2006 article that the Interior Department's handling of Indian trust matters has been a "national disgrace." Obama initially assigned Harper to be his lead adviser on the department, but now Harper is advising the campaign more narrowly on Indian gaming. Harper was registered to lobby on sovereignty issues for a tribe as recently as this year but did not personally lobby, transition aides and a tribe official said.
_An Obama transition adviser for health and human services, Bill Corr, lobbied to prevent children from smoking as executive director of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The group has spent $675,000 this year trying to influence policymakers. Corr has told Obama he will not offer advice on tobacco issues.
_A transition advisory board member, Mark Gitenstein, was registered until August to lobby on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AT&T Inc. and financial firms such as Ernst & Young LLP and Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. Gitenstein is working on transition management issues, not specific policies, but has agreed not to deal with topics on which he lobbied.
Overall, the people Obama is relying on to build his administration have represented unions; energy, environmental groups, insurance, and drug companies; Wal-Mart; the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; and the lobbying arm of the Washington-based Center for American Progress. The center is a think tank headed by John Podesta, former chief of staff to Bill Clinton and now co-chairman of Obama's transition.
Also prominent on Obama's new team are his big-money fundraisers. At least 18 of Obama's major financial backers are helping him create his administration. They collected at least $50,000 each from friends and associates to help pay for the most expensive presidential campaign in history.
A few raised at least $500,000 each. They include two former officials from the Federal Communications Commission: Donald Gips, a one-time aide to Vice President Al Gore who is co-chairman of Obama's teams reviewing government agencies; and Julius Genachowski, who was an executive at Barry Diller's IAC/InterActiveCorp, when the Internet giant owned Ticketmaster and Home Shopping Network. Genachowski is working on technology and government reform policy for the new administration.
A former Justice Department official advising Obama on the department, Thomas Perrelli, raised at least $500,000 for Obama. Perrelli is managing partner of a Washington law firm, Jenner & Block LLP. He lobbied pro bono in 2002 on behalf of victims of the 1998 Africa embassy bombings. His firm's law clients have included the mortgage company Fannie Mae, General Motors and the husband of Terri Schiavo, the brain-damaged woman at the center of a bitter right-to-die battle.
Perrelli, a copyright expert, has represented Hollywood studios and the music industry cracking down on Internet piracy — a lingering problem facing the department.
This is how Washington works: People work for the government or seek to influence it, and often pass from one role to the other through what is known as "the revolving door." Policy experts routinely use their expertise to influence the government.
Gary Andres, a lobbyist who was a White House aide in the first Bush administration, said it is unrealistic to cut out lobbyists when recruiting policy experts for a new administration.
"A lot of the people you're going to draw upon, if they're not in government, are involved in lobbying," he said.
Despite Obama's efforts to insulate his new administration from what might be tainted advice, lobbyists' involvement in the new government warrants close scrutiny, said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan institute that studies the influence business.
"They are taking a risk by taking these people on board," Krumholz said. "If they're viewed as being in the pocket of industry, that is not going to be beneficial to this administration that is trying so hard to claim a new mantle."
A former State Department official, Tom Donilon, is helping Obama on foreign policy. Donilon worked as a registered lobbyist at Fannie Mae from 1999 until 2005, when the current mortgage crisis was quietly brewing. Donilon was part of the team reporting more than $40 million in lobbying activity during that period.
Another Obama adviser, Michael Strautmanis, worked for trial lawyers as recently as 2005 on issues related to medical malpractice and health care liability, and in 2004 on asbestos issues. Strautmanis is a former aide to Obama in the Senate. He heads public liaison and intergovernmental affairs at Obama's transition office.
In addition to the 12-month restriction, Obama bars lobbyists from making donations to cover transition costs and will restrict access to his administration for transition team members who later take up lobbying. Podesta has called the self-imposed limits "the strictest, most far-reaching ethics rules of any transition team in history."
Obama's aides said they are focused on each adviser's policy credentials. But watchdog advocates say vigilance will be needed. "The question always is, with that kind of money, what is the influence and the interest they bring?" said Bill Buzenberg, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Public Integrity.
There are roughly 15,000 registered lobbyists in Washington. But there are probably six times that many who meet a common-sense definition of lobbyist, said James Thurber, who teaches lobbying at American University. For example, Obama health policy adviser and likely health secretary, former Sen. Tom Daschle, has worked for the lobbying and law firm Alston & Bird, but does not register personally because he advises clients rather than directly contacting government officials.
That is a technicality based on the narrow "lobbyist" definition, Thurber said.
The transition recognized potential conflicts could arise even beyond the strict legal definition of lobbying. Thus, Pamela Gilbert, who is working on consumer product safety issues for Obama, has withdrawn on an issue that was part of her law practice rather than her lobbyist work: federal pre-emption of state laws.
"If someone is paid to try to change public policy or stop something, that's a lobbyist," said Thurber, adding that lobbyists are a constant. "I don't think you can govern without them. The important thing is to be honest and transparent."
___
Associated Press writers Jim Drinkard, Larry Margasak and Frank Bass contributed to this report